<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Metal Detector's Blog</title>
	<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com</link>
	<description>About Metal Detecting and Metal Detectors</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Minelab Explorer SE Reviews by randy</title>
		<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/minelab-explorer-se-reviews/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/minelab-explorer-se-reviews/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Quality and craftmanship is not very good for a detector at PRICE 1300.00. U.S.A MINELAB Warranty Service IMO is poor. I did give performance a 9 when it works. Just don't expect long life out of the minelab se IMO. It started to have problems that would cuase pinpointing and the targets id system to be wrong and at times very frustrating aT THE SAME SITES. I would have to reboot the system and then put in my old setting to fix the problem  untill this stop working. Yes I keep my loop cover clean.

But before it started to have problems the detector work great mybe i got a lemon but u.s.a minelab warranty service IMO is BAD and why I will NOT be BUYING another MINELAB!!!!! Quality and craftmanship  Is POOR for 1300.00 dollar detector. 

I did not fine it to hard to learn but I was digging anything that hit in the + area. Which will teach you the readings and should be done at ever new site you go to.

Imo if you got minelab se that has hard time pinpointing you got a lemon.&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 5&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Settings &#038; Options&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Affordability&lt;/label&gt;: 1&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Quality &#038; Craftmanship&lt;/label&gt;: 4&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 9&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Battery Life&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality and craftmanship is not very good for a detector at PRICE 1300.00. U.S.A MINELAB Warranty Service IMO is poor. I did give performance a 9 when it works. Just don&#8217;t expect long life out of the minelab se IMO. It started to have problems that would cuase pinpointing and the targets id system to be wrong and at times very frustrating aT THE SAME SITES. I would have to reboot the system and then put in my old setting to fix the problem  untill this stop working. Yes I keep my loop cover clean.</p>
<p>But before it started to have problems the detector work great mybe i got a lemon but u.s.a minelab warranty service IMO is BAD and why I will NOT be BUYING another MINELAB!!!!! Quality and craftmanship  Is POOR for 1300.00 dollar detector. </p>
<p>I did not fine it to hard to learn but I was digging anything that hit in the + area. Which will teach you the readings and should be done at ever new site you go to.</p>
<p>Imo if you got minelab se that has hard time pinpointing you got a lemon.
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 5</li>
<li><label>Settings &#038; Options</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 7</li>
<li><label>Affordability</label>: 1</li>
<li><label>Quality &#038; Craftmanship</label>: 4</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 9</li>
<li><label>Battery Life</label>: 6</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whites Matrix M6 Reviews by Kees</title>
		<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/whites-matrix-m6-reviews/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Kees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/whites-matrix-m6-reviews/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>good detector&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Settings &#038; Options&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Affordability&lt;/label&gt;: 5&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Quality &#038; Craftmanship&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Battery Life&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good detector
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 7</li>
<li><label>Settings &#038; Options</label>: 6</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 7</li>
<li><label>Affordability</label>: 5</li>
<li><label>Quality &#038; Craftmanship</label>: 7</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 6</li>
<li><label>Battery Life</label>: 8</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whites MXT Reviews by Tin</title>
		<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/whites-mxt-reviews/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/whites-mxt-reviews/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Possibly the best all around detector in the Whites line up. Super performance, ease of use with quick adjustments, Sturdy, well balanced,

Have not been able to find another detector that is more of a pleasure to use than the MXT, and I have tried many. You can keep your touch pads and 9 trillion frequencies because everytime I am on a group or competition hunt or on a relic hunt with different brands anything can find the stuff so it's more about what feels right to you that matters.&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Settings &#038; Options&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Affordability&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Quality &#038; Craftmanship&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 9&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Battery Life&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly the best all around detector in the Whites line up. Super performance, ease of use with quick adjustments, Sturdy, well balanced,</p>
<p>Have not been able to find another detector that is more of a pleasure to use than the MXT, and I have tried many. You can keep your touch pads and 9 trillion frequencies because everytime I am on a group or competition hunt or on a relic hunt with different brands anything can find the stuff so it&#8217;s more about what feels right to you that matters.
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Settings &#038; Options</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Affordability</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Quality &#038; Craftmanship</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 9</li>
<li><label>Battery Life</label>: 8</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Minelab Explorer SE Reviews by jim brown</title>
		<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/minelab-explorer-se-reviews/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>jim brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/minelab-explorer-se-reviews/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>very nice detector&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Settings &#038; Options&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Affordability&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Quality &#038; Craftmanship&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 10&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Battery Life&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice detector
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Settings &#038; Options</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Affordability</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Quality &#038; Craftmanship</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 10</li>
<li><label>Battery Life</label>: 7</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Garrett GTI 2500 Reviews by Tony C.</title>
		<link>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/garrett-gti-2500-reviews/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://metaldetectorsblog.com/2008/01/26/garrett-gti-2500-reviews/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Very versatile machine, great for hunting coins.  A bit heavy, would be better if it would weigh between 2.8 to 3.4lbs.  It would be nice if Garrett would update the DSP processing to today's technology.&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Settings &#038; Options&lt;/label&gt;: 9&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 9&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Affordability&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Quality &#038; Craftmanship&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 9&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Battery Life&lt;/label&gt;: 8&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very versatile machine, great for hunting coins.  A bit heavy, would be better if it would weigh between 2.8 to 3.4lbs.  It would be nice if Garrett would update the DSP processing to today&#8217;s technology.
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Settings &#038; Options</label>: 9</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 9</li>
<li><label>Affordability</label>: 6</li>
<li><label>Quality &#038; Craftmanship</label>: 8</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 9</li>
<li><label>Battery Life</label>: 8</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
